Skip to main content

Beyond Kirkpatrick?

After reading Beyond Kirkpatrick by Tom Werner, and Jane Bozarth's post on Alternatives to Kirkpatrick, I was satisfied to hear that there has been effort to better the evaluation process. This is the kind of information I was looking for when I posted Kirkpatrick's Four Level Evaluation Model, knowing that people would have tried, tested and evaluated the model by this time.

I did receive feedback supporting Kirkpatrick's model from John Pasinosky, Richeek and Geeta Bose. All of them supported the model and said it had worked well for them. John Pasinosky said:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have tried to incorporate the 4 levels in my instructional design practice. It is very valuable if you don't have any other plans in place. ( - In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king!). The good part about it is less that you can make a better product than that it gives you a framework to know what went wrong when it does go wrong - or someone is unhappy with the results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Geeta Bose, agreed that the Kirkpatrick model had been useful. While saying that she added:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
While this is a great foundation, like all other methodologies, this too should evolve to fit the changing needs of the training industry. This model (in the classical sense) does not help measure the ROI from training. This model also emphasizes on "post training evaluation" while evaluation should be an ongoing process.

At Kern, we have evolved an evaluation methodology that has worked well for us and our clients.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richeek agreed too adding:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is definitely practical. It all depends on how you market it. If managers & other decision-makers see the value, they'll definitely agree. I have gone into meetings where managers have come in late and start a meeting saying they have to leave it early and then have them say at the scheduled end, "Can we extend this meeting? Would you have the time?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another presentation I found by Bersin and Associates (designed way back in 2006) gives a good insight into the problems in Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation, that I found practical. I don't mean to down sell Kirkpatrick's model but all I'm saying is that we need to move on and come up with more current ideas. Quoting from Jane's post:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the interest of fairness I would like to add that that Kirkpatrick himself has pointed out some of the problems with the taxonomy, and suggested that in seeking to apply it the training field has perhaps put the cart before the horse. He advises working backwards through his four levels more as a design, rather than an evaluation, strategy; that is: What business results are you after? What on-the-job behavior/performance change will this require? How can we be confident that learners, sent back to the work site, are equipped to perform as desired? And finally: how can we deliver the instruction in a way that is appealing and engaging?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I believe this would be true as change is the only constant in every field.

My 2 cents
It's good to know that certain strategies and models have proven in the past, but our requirements today are changing greatly and we need to move on, redefine strategies and redesign models to address the changing needs of learners. I believe it is imperative to re look at our existing training strategies, and evaluate courses to bring in this change.

My questions to all of you would be:
1. Do you think there is a need to change the way we design training?
2. Do you think we need to have more dynamic ways to address the problems faced by our learner?
3. How do you think evaluation should ideally be done to help improve and impact learning greatly?

Comments

  1. I would rather say, there is a requirement to widen the perspective. There are traditional learning audience and relatively modern audience. There are tons of training resources already available that would satisfy the traditional audience well. The training should address the requirements of modern audience as well. By modern audience I mean who prefer collaborative learning, interactive e-learning and learning through non-conventional sources.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Big Question: Workplace Learning in 10 Years?

This month's Big Question question is Workplace Learning in 10 years? A very pertinent question to ask in such times, as we hear of more and more failure rates in formal and push learning. Most of our generation have learned this way, and some like me have always found such learning boring from the very beginning. My parents, would force me to learn the way the other 'good' kids learned, and I would resist and prefer to stay in my own dreamworld, that I found more fascinating than my study books. Fortunately for me, every year before the final exam my mom would hound me into preparing for the exams and I would come out scoring reasonably well. Now I can owe my 'decent' job to all the 'push' I got from my parents. But given a chance, I would not like to go back to studying the way I did in school, though I owe my 'formal' degrees to the 'formal' learning I received. But I did have some pretty good teachers. My Geography teacher had a unique s

Of Android, Mobile Games and Learning Experiences

I never thought I'll write about learning games and mobile learning until I bought my Android. People have asked me, why Android phone? My answer has been that I love Android as it is breaking new ground for mobile computing and open technologies. Android is versatile as it is not limited only to mobile phones, but it can be installed on various devices. Android gives developers the opportunity to leverage their development skills, while also building an exciting and active community, just as ground breaking as Java. Just thought of adding this: "When technologies don't restrain you, they enable you to innovate." I truly believe open technologies are the future! I couldn't have written this post without experiencing the real thing. I had set aside to buy my Android (Nexus S) after some expenses were out of the way. But my 5 year old Nokia gave in and I had no other choice but to buy my Nexus immediately. I am extremely happy. Having the power of a smartphone ,

The New Age Instructional Designer

Instructional design provides a gamut of principles and models that enable you to train people effectively in various areas of expertise. The role of an instructional designer is essentially driven by a need to find appropriate solutions by applying instructional design strategies and models to transfer information to users who use a particular product or service to perform their jobs. Changed Learning Methods As time progressed and technologies evolved, the role of the instructional designer as we understood it several years back, underwent a paradigm shift. In spite of client demands to create conventional elearning courses, the fact is that the way people are learning today has changed phenomenally due to the increased access to social media tools and advanced mobile devices. Twitter, blogs, wikis, and discussions have become the new age learning methods. Learner's look for relevance and access information only when it is needed. The concept of reading everything that co