IDCI Session Highlights
Today's IDCI session by Abhinava (Twitter ID: @Abhinava) was extremely thought provoking for me. The topic of discussion, LH Theory (Love-Hate Theory) triggered on a lot of thought on how to be sensitive to the learner and use 'love' to design courses. To know more about the session go to twitter and search with the hash tag #IDCI. The session highlighted the need to be sensitive to the learner needs more holistically. At the same time, the session compared two modes of creating learning; Love and Hate. The session also emphasized on when to use each mode of learning.
Here's the presentation that Abhinava put on Slideshare:
So when do you use the LH Theory?
You use Love when:
So, you use Hate theory when you only mean business and don't plan to invest a lot of time. You want a quick-fix solution that just serves the purpose. I found this discussion extremely relevant in today's times, as most often we seem to get pushed towards the Hate theory for purely business reasons. It is also important to be sure that you don't use Hate out of ignorance.
Sometimes, when you're in a situation where the business demand is high, using Hate does seem like the most practical thing to do. The need analysis moves from addressing the learner need towards addressing the business need! One could easily argue here that isn't the learner need the business need as well? My answer is yes at a high-level, but probably not exactly how we define it when we get to the specifics. I call this kind of learning 'Business-driven' or 'Business-centric'. The following are some justifications for creating 'business-driven' learning:
Given a chance, IDs would love to make the most effective and engaging courses. Some attributes that contribute to making such courses are:
When you create business-driven learning, you may tend to skim/rush through many of the above steps. But business-driven learning becomes a reality as end of day 'business' is what everything boils down to. This of course does not undermine the fact that you do need to deliver the best possible solution in this situation. Here are some things one can do:
Today's IDCI session by Abhinava (Twitter ID: @Abhinava) was extremely thought provoking for me. The topic of discussion, LH Theory (Love-Hate Theory) triggered on a lot of thought on how to be sensitive to the learner and use 'love' to design courses. To know more about the session go to twitter and search with the hash tag #IDCI. The session highlighted the need to be sensitive to the learner needs more holistically. At the same time, the session compared two modes of creating learning; Love and Hate. The session also emphasized on when to use each mode of learning.
Here's the presentation that Abhinava put on Slideshare:
The LH Theory
View more presentations from abhinava.sn.
So when do you use the LH Theory?
You use Love when:
- You want to create learning for a long term.
- You want to create a long term relationship/bond.
- When you have time to create good learning.
- When there is a lot to gain.
- You want to create learning for the short term and don't really care much about the outcome.
- When you don't need to create any long term relationship/bond.
- When you don't have time.
So, you use Hate theory when you only mean business and don't plan to invest a lot of time. You want a quick-fix solution that just serves the purpose. I found this discussion extremely relevant in today's times, as most often we seem to get pushed towards the Hate theory for purely business reasons. It is also important to be sure that you don't use Hate out of ignorance.
Sometimes, when you're in a situation where the business demand is high, using Hate does seem like the most practical thing to do. The need analysis moves from addressing the learner need towards addressing the business need! One could easily argue here that isn't the learner need the business need as well? My answer is yes at a high-level, but probably not exactly how we define it when we get to the specifics. I call this kind of learning 'Business-driven' or 'Business-centric'. The following are some justifications for creating 'business-driven' learning:
- You really need a quick solution to address the business need and get training out there to learners. Meaning your TTM (Time-to-market) is the #1 priority.
- Shelf life of the learning material is short (6 months to a year) and content changes/updates very often.
- Your learning supports the business and is not the primary revenue generator.
- Topic for learning is a mature one (like a product for niche areas) and people in the domain already know a lot of the basic concepts. Some are very advanced users. So, all you need to do is to tell them the new features and concepts and they will soon be using the knowledge hands-on.
Given a chance, IDs would love to make the most effective and engaging courses. Some attributes that contribute to making such courses are:
- Perform a thorough learner analysis.
- Do a thorough needs assessment for your learners meaning drill down to the exact learning outcome that is expected.
- Empathize with the learner and create simple, usable and easily navigable courses.
- Don't make the course a content dump. Take time to make the course effective and engaging.
- Use well-researched real-time scenarios to add relevance to your learning material.
- Personalize feedback and strategies if the learner has high EQ (Emotional Intelligence)
- Design simple but effective practices.
- Use practices when absolutely necessary and not for very simple procedures.
- Validate and choose the appropriate delivery medium based on content complexity. Very advanced courses with lots of hands-on are better delivered in classroom training. Do not try to achieve this goal using online learning.
When you create business-driven learning, you may tend to skim/rush through many of the above steps. But business-driven learning becomes a reality as end of day 'business' is what everything boils down to. This of course does not undermine the fact that you do need to deliver the best possible solution in this situation. Here are some things one can do:
- Be extremely clear about the business objective.
- Do a periodic detailed learning profiling and assessment of the prerequisite knowledge and skills of your learner. Knowing the prerequisites will enable you to reduce the flab on your course and focus on a smaller amount of content. Eventually, this reduces your TTM.
- Research on and recommend a list of rapid elearning tools that work for the business solution.
- Leverage on existing material and spend time refining and updating it to the most current information.
- Focus on reducing knowledge gaps rather than covering the whole bulk of content.
- Use social learning as much as possible and focus on creating short and effective micro-learning strategies.
Awesome summary Sreya :)
ReplyDeleteAbhinava's session was thought provoking. In real world situation only business driven learning seems feasible.
We need to think about learners and learning more than anything
My take is...
ReplyDeleteIf the design is NOT 'truly' business centric - it is not learner centric.
The best the business CAN achieve is when the learner is performing at optimum levels (notice, 'Optimum', not 'peak')
and for the learner to perform at optimum levels, optimum training is required.
Optimum training is the training that will achieve the required results in the Least amount of time using the LEAST amount of resources (Not random higher Interactivity, Immersivity).
Simple learning is often the MOST effective learning.
Business Centric Learning IS Learner Centric Learning - It can NEVER be otherwise...
(If it is... it means either the business if wrong or the design is wrong)
BTB... thanks for covering LH theory - I appreciate it... A Lot...! :)